Cahier 201718Title:  On the empirical validity of axioms in unconstrained bargaining  Abstract:  We report experimental results and test cooperative models of unstructured bargaining by checking the empirical relevance of underlying axioms. Our data support strong efficiency, symmetry, independence of irrelevant alternatives and monotonicity, and reject scale invariance. Individual rationality is violated by a significant fraction of agreements when in conflict to implement the equal split. The three wellknown bargaining solutions that satisfy the confirmed properties explain the observed agreements reasonably well. The most frequent agreement in our sample is the egalitarian solution. In terms of the average Euclidean distance, the theoretical solution that best explains the data is the dealmeout solution (Binmore et al., 1989; Binmore et al., 1991), followed very closely by the equalgains solution (Roth and Malouf, 1979). Popular solutions that satisfy scale invariance and individual rationality, as the wellknown Nash or KalaiSmorodinsky bargaining solutions, perform poorly in the laboratory.  Keyword(s):  bilateral bargaining, experiments, Nash bargaining solution, egalitarian solution, dealmeout solution, individual rationality, scale invariance  Auteur(s) :  Noemí Navarro, Róbert Veszteg  JEL Class.:  C78, C91, D63  Télécharger le cahier Retour à la liste des Cahier du GRETHA (2017) 
